![robocopy vs emcopy robocopy vs emcopy](https://www.networkantics.com/wp-content/uploads/SevenZip.png)
I personally prefer to deal with each top level folder as a separate emcopy run, using a for loop as follows…
#ROBOCOPY VS EMCOPY HOW TO#
Working examples of emcopy commands below, with differences highlighted.Įmcopy_v4.14.exe “S:\My Source Folder” D:\My_Dest_Folder *.* /s /secfix /o /a /i /d /c /th 32 /r:5 /w:3Įmcopy_v4.14.exe “S:\My Source Folder” D:\My_Dest_Folder *.* /s /nosec /o /a /i /d /c /th 256 /r:5 /w:3Ī more elaborate example showing how to exclude multiple directories specified by full path or just as a nameĮmcopy_v4.14.exe “S:\My Source Folder” D:\My_Dest_Folder *.* /xd “System Volume Information” homedirs profiles wtsprofiles /s /secfix /o /a /i /d /c /th 32 /r:5 /w:3 In practice, emcopy vs robocopy – I have found it to be much faster than robocopy. It defaults to 64 threads but can be told to use up to 256 threads, massively speeding up copy operations. It allows you to back up the file and directory security-ACLs, owner information,Īnd audit information-from a source directory to a destination directory without copying NTFS partition, keeping security the same on the copy as on the original. The command syntax is much like robocopy so if you’re familar with that, then using emcopy will be easy.Įmcopy lets you copy a file or directory (and included subdirectories) from and to an Small files to SSD, richcopy.Emc’s emcopy (part of emc’s rather elusive but freely downloadable if you can find it CIFS_Tools.zip package) is akin to Microsoft’s own robocopy, only faster with extra benefits. So, large files and current systems, I recommend plain Windows. I was copying 3 ISOs, and it copied so fast that by the time I realized the switch was overloaded (and I could not check my email on the desktop) the file copy had finished.
#ROBOCOPY VS EMCOPY WINDOWS 8#
Copying from a laptop running Windows 8 (Core i7-750) to a server, was the first time I got real limit on the switch (a HP V1910 that I have in my desk). Little known but SMB2 introduces the use of RAM as cache for the file copy, SMB3 (Windows ) further optimizes it. in SSD it doesn't matter as it will be ramdom and that is where SSD excels at :)Īlso to note, if you are copying using SMB3 and up, Windows GUI is more efficient.
![robocopy vs emcopy robocopy vs emcopy](https://kimconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/scheduled-task-action.png)
![robocopy vs emcopy robocopy vs emcopy](https://www.nghenhachay.net/image/MXk3dm1Jdksyejg/mqdefault.jpg)
Richcopy will be faster but can cause a lot of partitioning in regular HDD. Would be a real time saver if I didn't have to run back and forth to check for errors the whole time.Īlso, it is worthy to note that robocopy does one copy at a time, richcopy is serialized and does 5 at a time b default. Going to play around with this Robo Copy. Check what M Boyle said, earlier, about using Backup Operators and the /b switch. If appdata folders are set to the User, only, then you don't have proper rights and won't be able to copy until you do. right?) DAdmins don't necessarily have rights to everything. I use the term loosely, normally when associating things which annoy me. Regarding the "Nonsense" portion of the post. We do have admin rights to the machines as domain admins. It's not nonsense when the file system tells you that you don't have access, it's the file system protecting your data as it's supposed to.
#ROBOCOPY VS EMCOPY WINDOWS 10#
We often need to make backups of the user's appdata folder here.Īm I correct in my assumptions that Robocopy will allow me to make an exact copy of the user's appdata folder without all the annoying "You don't have permissions"/"File is in use" nonsense we normally get when using standard Windows 10 explorer copying?ĭ.RThe account being used need to have rights / access to the folders you are trying to copy.